- Mar 28, 2021
- 2,482
- 3,928
it's pretty much a more hardcore form of erotic asphyxiation. It was done with the consent of the girl in a safe way, so I don't think it constitutes as violenceIs self-harming not violence?
it's pretty much a more hardcore form of erotic asphyxiation. It was done with the consent of the girl in a safe way, so I don't think it constitutes as violenceIs self-harming not violence?
Self-harm is almost always compulsive, so yes, I'd say it qualifies as violence.Is self-harming not violence?
It's violence sure but what's your point? It's consenting, it's called BDSMthe fact that she voluntarily does this does not mean that it has ceased to be violence in principle
I have nothing against your comment. Purely theoretically, such things are not violence, because this is a brothel, and inside the brothel there is perversion, and if we go further inside perverted hobbies, then there are also hard sexual cases, but what does that mean? this is bdsm, if you have already entered the threshold of a brothel and are faced with bdsm-style humiliation, is there any point in complaining that “this is violence”? because you have already stepped down this path... everyone likes hard sex and all sorts of bullshit... peace for everyone!I remember a scene where we were asked to put a girl who was suspended by her legs with her head in the water. Does this not count as physical violence, or maybe I misunderstood something?
Pashol nahui 4ortI have nothing against your comment. Purely theoretically, such things are not violence, because this is a brothel, and inside the brothel there is perversion, and if we go further inside perverted hobbies, then there are also hard sexual cases, but what does that mean? this is bdsm, if you have already entered the threshold of a brothel and are faced with bdsm-style humiliation, is there any point in complaining that “this is violence”? because you have already stepped down this path... everyone likes hard sex and all sorts of bullshit... peace for everyone!
Posle tebyaPashol nahui 4ort
Just because the MC winds up sticking with the Club doesn't necessarily mean he's also sticking with the current owners or their various agendas. It seems very likely the Club is going to be changing soon, one way or the other.You mean you don't think the Club endings (confirmed to not be all evil) to be side with a physically abusive sadist, a gangster who prefers physical violence, or a murderer who enjoys physically torturing people?
Exactly! By the currently available information we have, from the current leaders only and maybe(!) August has a chance to remain in a leadership position after the big bang if we play a goodish, even neutral, Edwin. Since for August PC is a business, as long as the good money comes in, he is ok with the situation.Just because the MC winds up sticking with the Club doesn't necessarily mean he's also sticking with the current owners or their various agendas. It seems very likely the Club is going to be changing soon, one way or the other.
I agree that Chuck is taunting or trying to taunt Sophia here, but I also think he is disappointed (not heartbroken that is too strong) he cannot leave lasting harm. It is the combination of the info we have currently why I think Chuck can be quite "hands on" if he wants to. While he enjoys the mental aspects more, the pysical is not unimportant. Chuck is very much about control and loss of control!That said, I agree that Chuck doesn't seem like the sort to resort to something as crude as physical violence, much less murder. Turret may think Chuck looks heartbroken that he's not allowed to inflict permanent harm on Sophia, but I see no sign of that. To me, he seems perfectly fine with the situation and is mentioning it purely to taunt Sophia about how her nominal immunity won't actually protect her from whatever Chuck has in mind.
depends on you and how you want MC to benefit, or how you want Rose to have to be in debt afterwards...What is the best solution to rose's problem?
agust, chuck, kate or felcia ....
if i am on her romance path!depends on you and how you want MC to benefit, or how you want Rose to have to be in debt afterwards...
I'd say chuck, he'll reject you and Ian will step in and help you instead, if you say yes, you'll get an extra exclusive Rosalind scene later.if i am on her romance path!
what do you think is the best option
all options work.if i am on her romance path!
what do you think is the best option
i don't like kate so i didn't talk to her in the first placeall options work.
- august has no string attached but it's violent and might have consequences.
- chuck leads to sharing her with Ian, so bromance moment, but you might no want to share her at all
- felicia means you are also on felicia's path. no string attached for Rose, but one for you. and you might want to go on Felicia's path without the money element, and Rose might not like having to depend on a competitor.
- kathleen, depends on her trust with MC and/or his traits. worse case, Rose has to pay back the money after the exhibition, meaning, she will have to whore herself out in the club for months. best case, MC manages to convince Kath to do it for free, no string attached.
so, like I said, it depends on what you want for the MC. Rose is already in a shitty situation anyway.
yes, he does tell Rose where he gets the money from. he is completely transparent. he wants the 3 girls to be friends, so for him it's a good way to make them get closer. whether it works or not is another matter entirely though he hides that Felicia gives the money for the sugar mommy deal and the date.i don't like kate so i didn't talk to her in the first place
so i talked to agust cause i don't want to share her
i think getting the money from felcia is the best option for the "might not like having to depend on a competitor" part did the mc tell her where he got the money from?